Not seeing a Scroll to Top Button? Go to our FAQ page for more info. Supreme Court revives Trump travel ban order - JusticeQuest
JusticeQuest  
-:

Go Back   JusticeQuest > And Justice for All > US Supreme Court

US Supreme Court United States Supreme Court cases; Past and Present.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2017, 12:16 PM
Athena's Avatar
Athena Athena is offline
Administrator
On A Justice Quest.
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 52,235
Mentioned: 620 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Thread Starter
Default Supreme Court revives Trump travel ban order

The Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his temporary bans on travelers from six Muslim-majority countries and all refugees to go into effect for people with no connection to the United States while agreeing to hear his appeals in the closely watched legal fight.

The court, which narrowed the scope of lower court rulings that had completely blocked his March 6 executive order, said it would hear arguments on the legality of one of Trump's signature policies in his first months as president in the court's next term, which starts in October.

The justices granted parts of his administration's emergency request to put the order into effect immediately while the legal battle continues.

The court said that the travel ban will go into effect "with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."



http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...litics+News%29
__________________
==============================\
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy

JQ TOS
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 06-26-2017, 05:15 PM
FL Girl FL Girl is offline
JQ Registered User
On A Justice Quest.
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida's beautiful west coast
Posts: 18,544
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Wow...that was quick......appears to be a cut and dry decision, no gray area. Sends a clear message to the lower court judges who kept blocking it. Perhaps though, it is too late to really stop more of the bad people from coming in. I believe they may have already been pouring in after Trump's first attempt was blocked.
__________________
"If anything could go wrong, it went wrong in this case..." ~ Judge Belvin Perry ~
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 06-26-2017, 05:18 PM
Athena's Avatar
Athena Athena is offline
Administrator
On A Justice Quest.
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 52,235
Mentioned: 620 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Thread Starter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FL Girl View Post
Wow...that was quick......appears to be a cut and dry decision, no gray area. Sends a clear message to the lower court judges who kept blocking it. Perhaps though, it is too late to really stop more of the bad people from coming in. I believe they may have already been pouring in after Trump's first attempt was blocked.
It was not cut and dry. Trump's travel ban was much broader. This ruling limits it until a hearing in the fall when a final decision will be made so it was a partial victory and I agree with it

The issue with the complete travel ban is it was also banning those that had work visas to work for corporations here ....... this will allow them in, at least for now.
__________________
==============================\
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy

JQ TOS

Last edited by Athena; 06-26-2017 at 05:33 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 06-26-2017, 08:23 PM
Luke Davis's Avatar
Luke Davis Luke Davis is offline
JQ Registered User
It isn’t what they call
you, it is what you answer to.
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 29,051
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
:: Amazed
Default

Too little, too late.
__________________
Spoiler

Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 06-26-2017, 08:56 PM
Bettychand's Avatar
Bettychand Bettychand is offline
JQ Registered User
On A Justice Quest.
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 14,009
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

What is most noteworthy is that not one Democratically-appointed Supreme Court jurist dissented; not Ginsburg, not Kagan, not Sotomayor, not Breyer. Indeed, the only dissent arose from the three conservative jurists who wanted to use the stay motion to scream down how bad the lower courts’ rulings were. Their confidence to dissent further signals what the dissenting Ninth Circuit jurists warned of months ago: that the courts striking down the travel ban had no good legal cause to do so.

The writing is now on the wall. As the Court noted, the most consequential aspect of the travel ban — the complete ban on those without ties to America from the list-of-six countries posing the most rate of travel risk — will have been fully enforced and satisfied by the time the case comes to the fall hearing. That is why the court requests further briefing on the possibility of mootness by fall on the big issue with the travel ban.


More at link.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/supr...ps-travel-ban/
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 06-26-2017, 09:01 PM
FL Girl FL Girl is offline
JQ Registered User
On A Justice Quest.
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida's beautiful west coast
Posts: 18,544
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettychand View Post
What is most noteworthy is that not one Democratically-appointed Supreme Court jurist dissented; not Ginsburg, not Kagan, not Sotomayor, not Breyer. Indeed, the only dissent arose from the three conservative jurists who wanted to use the stay motion to scream down how bad the lower courts’ rulings were. Their confidence to dissent further signals what the dissenting Ninth Circuit jurists warned of months ago: that the courts striking down the travel ban had no good legal cause to do so.

The writing is now on the wall. As the Court noted, the most consequential aspect of the travel ban — the complete ban on those without ties to America from the list-of-six countries posing the most rate of travel risk — will have been fully enforced and satisfied by the time the case comes to the fall hearing. That is why the court requests further briefing on the possibility of mootness by fall on the big issue with the travel ban.


More at link.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/supr...ps-travel-ban/
Thanks, Betty...for pointing this out......
__________________
"If anything could go wrong, it went wrong in this case..." ~ Judge Belvin Perry ~
Reply With Quote top
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ban, court, order, revives, supreme, travel, trump

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.5 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
© justicequest.net 2016
no new posts